Reduzierte Artikel in dieser Kategorie
| Verlag | Oxford University Press |
| Auflage | 2022 |
| Seiten | 200 |
| Format | 14,0 x 1,7 x 22,1 cm |
| Gewicht | 342 g |
| Artikeltyp | Englisches Buch |
| EAN | 9780197633649 |
| Bestell-Nr | 19763364EA |
The idea that there are some facts that call for explanation serves as an unexamined premise in influential arguments for the inexistence of moral or mathematical facts and for the existence of a god and of other universes. This book is the first to offer a comprehensive and critical treatment of this idea. It argues that calling for explanation is a sometimes-misleading figure of speech rather than a fundamental property of facts.
Klappentext:
This book is the first comprehensive treatment of the idea that some facts call for explanation. This idea serves as a premise in influential arguments for the inexistence of moral facts, for the inexistence of mathematical facts, for the existence of a god, for the existence of multiple universes, and other topics. Despite its prevalence and importance in debates across fields of study, however, this premise is rarely questioned, and the distinction between factsthat call for explanation and those that do not has thus far received little careful attention. According to what Baras calls the naïve picture, facts possess a certain property, which he calls strikingness, to different degrees. To the extent that a fact has this property, it calls for explanation. Wefeel compelled to figure out what this property is, and what special explanation amounts to, but this approach, Baras argues, leads to a dead end.Attending to this essential and yet strangely neglected issue, Baras argues th at if calling for explanation is thought of as a fixed property of facts that justifies explanatory inferences, as many believe it to be, this leads to a futile philosophical project and confusions in reasoning. He develops the view that calling for explanation is merely a figurative form of speech without a fixed meaning. There is no unified property shared by all facts that call for explanation, and there is nounified kind of explanation that all such facts call for.
Rezension:
I am not entirely convinced by Baras's arguments, though I found them fascinating and, indeed, I encountered something worth thinking about on nearly every page of this book. Analysis